Legal Opinion
Randall v. Rapoza
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided July 12, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Wheatley, PJ.
The plaintiff (Randall), the brother-in-law of Jason Rapoza (Rapoza) and an investor in the defendants’ business of dealing in antiques, sued both defendants for breach of contract, and to enforce a promissory note given by Rapoza, for money loaned to them. Because they failed to answer the complaint, they were defaulted and an execution issued. It is from the denial of the defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment that the defendants have filed this appeal under Dist/Mun. Cts. RA.D.A, Rule 8C. We find no error and affirm the trial judge’s finding.
On October 14,1999,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Coveney v. President & Trustees of the College of the Holy CrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Bucchiere v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Bird v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Burger Chef Systems, Inc. v. Servfast of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Choice Health v. Devcon Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006