In re the Personal Restraint of Crace
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 This case concerns the standard for assessing prejudice in a personal restraint petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Hoyt Crace was convicted of attempted second degree assault with a deadly weapon. This was his third strike offense, resulting in a life sentence without the possibility of early release. Crace brought a timely personal restraint petition asserting he received *837ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel did not request an instruction on the lesser-included offense of unlawful display of a deadly weapon, a nonstrike offense. A divided Court of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Hoyt Crace v. Robert HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re the Personal Restraint of GomezWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LopezWashington Supreme Court · 2018
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.