Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Crace

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2012No. 85131-0PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 This case concerns the standard for assessing prejudice in a personal restraint petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Hoyt Crace was convicted of attempted second degree assault with a deadly weapon. This was his third strike offense, resulting in a life sentence without the possibility of early release. Crace brought a timely personal restraint petition asserting he received *837ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel did not request an instruction on the lesser-included offense of unlawful display of a deadly weapon, a nonstrike offense. A divided Court of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hoyt Crace v. Robert HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of GomezWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. LopezWashington Supreme Court · 2018

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API