Legal Opinion
A.K. & R. Whipple Plumbing & Heating v. Guy
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 2004No. 20020495PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Thomas D. Guy (Guy) and Aspen Construction (Aspen) were defendants in a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action brought by A.K. & R. Whipple Plumbing and Heating (Whipple). We granted Guy and Aspen’s petition for certiorari review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s award of no attorney fees in connection with this case. They urge us to find that the trial court’s application of a so-called “flexible and reasoned approach” to determining the “successful party” pursuant to section 38-1-18 of the Utah Code wrongly led the trial court to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Platts v. Parents Helping ParentsUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Neff v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Xlear, Inc. v. Focus Nutrition, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Bilanzich v. LonettiUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Burton v. Jeremiah Beach Parker Restoration & Construction Management Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Anderson & Karrenberg v. WarnickCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.