Ingram v. Kasey's Associates
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCureton, Judge
Henry Ingram appeals from an adverse judgment on his claim for specific performance arising from his attempt to exercise an option to purchase contained within a long-term lease. We reverse and remand.
I. FACTS
On March 1, 1984, Ingram agreed to lease property for ten years from Kasey’s Associates, Ltd. (Kasey’s). The lease provided for an option to purchase with the rental payments applied to the purchase price if Ingram exercised the option. An amortization schedule was attached to the lease. The option provision in the lease reads as follows:
2. OPTION TO PURCHASE
LESSEE shall have the right…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Mohammed Abdallah v. Abdrhmin AbdallahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Erich v. GranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- First Union Nat. Bank of SC v. SodenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Muniz v. Crystal Lake Project, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Edisto Island Historical Preservation Society, Inc. v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003