Legal Opinion
Knoblock v. Waale-Camplan Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1956No. Civ. 21516PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Cross-defendants J. C. and Merridy Crookshanks have appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, which provides that plaintiff Fred H. Knoblock recover from defendants Waale-Camplan Company and A. Gelfan and Company, jointly and severally, the sum of $3,451.20 and that cross-complainant Waale-Camplan Company recover from the cross-defendants A. Gelfan and Company, J. C. Crookshanks and Merridy C. Crook-shanks, jointly and severally, the sum of $2,556. Neither of the defendants Waale-Camplan Company and A. Gelfan and Company has appealed and the portion of the judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Gray v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lake v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Mannon v. PesulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Middlesex Insurance v. MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Barber v. LeRoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Cook v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.