Legal Opinion

Lake v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1921No. S. F. No. 9770PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the defendant from proceeding with the trial of the case of Lake v. Sterling Development Co. and others as to certain defendants, upon the ground that the court is precluded from trying the issues between plaintiff and such defendants by reason of a previous adjudication of those rights from which the defendants referred to failed to appeal. The other defendants took an appeal and on such appeal a judgment was rendered reversing the judgment. The question is as to the effect of the judgment of reversal upon the rights of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. WeinsveigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Johnson v. Phenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Title Etc. Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Mercantile Tr. Co. of S.F. v. Superior Court of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Blache v. BlacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API