Legal Opinion

Straus v. Prudential Employee Savings Plan

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 24, 2003No. CV 02 3067(RJD)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

DEARIE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, all of whom are participants in the Prudential Employee Savings Plan (“PESP” or the “Plan”), bring this action under Section 502 of the Employer Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Plaintiffs allege that defendants discriminated against them in violation of Section 510 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1140, by adopting and retroactively applying arbitrary limitations on their right under the Plan to transfer funds from one investment option to anoth er in unlimited amounts. Plaintiffs also claim that, in adopting these…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Stanley Cohen, Gerald A. Garfinkle, Eastern Artists and Drafting Materials, Inc. v. Elliott Koenig, and Robert KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wharton v. Duke Realty, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Borneman v. Principal Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003
  3. AM Medica Communications Group v. KilgallenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API