Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. of America v. Bean

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 1, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hannah

— Affirming.

L. B. Bean was engaged in the operation of a transfer line for the transportation of passengers and their baggage, and mail, express and freight shipments, between Hartford and Beaver Dam, in Ohio County.

He was visited by an agent of the International Harvester Company of America, who proposed to furnish an auto-wagon suitable for operation in the transfer line mentioned. This agent was made acquainted with the nature and condition of the roads to be traversed and the needs and requirements of Bean in the way of vehicular equipment.

Bean possessed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ideal Heating Co. v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Cook v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Packard Norfolk, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. LeaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  5. Hopkinsville Motor Company v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API