Legal Opinion
Roberson v. . Griffin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 21, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■StaCY, J.
On the hearing, the title offered was properly made to depend upon the construction of the following clauses in the deed from Asa T. Peel to E. H. Roberson and wife, Laura M. O. Roberson, under which plaintiffs acquired title to the locus in quo:
“That the said Asa T. Peel, in consideration of natural love and affection for his niece and her husband, E. H. Roberson, and for his services for me in caring for me for a number of years past, and so long as I shall live as hereby acknowledged, has bargained and sold, and by these presents does bargain, sell, and convey to said E. H.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- May v. Lewis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Cotten v. . MoseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Auman v. AumanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Walker v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Turlington v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- House v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Turlington v. . LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Williams v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.