Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Powers

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1925No. Docket No. 2967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action for damages for the alleged seizure and conversion by defendants of a certain quantity of tomatoes and a certain quantity of Egyptian corn.

The action is in conversion, and the complaint, among other facts therein stated, alleges:

“That at the time of the commencement of this action and for a long time prior thereto the plaintiff was the owner of and entitled to the possession of all the following described personal property, namely: 196,605 pounds of tomatoes and 102,040 pounds of Egyptian corn which were raised on plaintiff’s ranch in said San Joaquin County in the year 1918.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sellick v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  4. Blaisdell v. StephensNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  5. City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kraft v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Biurrun v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Anglo-California National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Perkins v. MaidenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API