Legal Opinion

Chung v. Scholl

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 26, 2019No. 8:19-cv-01746Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHRISTOPHER CHUNG, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. * Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01746-PX TOM L. SCHOLL, et al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendants Tom L. Scholl’s and Keystone Coal Co.’s (“Keystone”) motion to dismiss. ECF No. 27. The Court finds no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss.1 I. Background This action arises from an ongoing business relationship between parties who engaged in a series of discrete…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Francis v. GiacomelliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  4. Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  5. Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API