Legal Opinion

State v. Hisakachi Umaki

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1918No. 14815PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Hardin, J., entered December 29, 1917, upon findings in favor of intervening defendants, in proceedings to forfeit boats and other property used in unlawful fishing, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— Hisakachi Umaki, I. Tabato, C. Ikemiza and T. Ikemiza were apprehended in Whatcom county for violation of the “Fisheries Code of Washington,” and certain of them were tried and convicted in the superior court. At the time of the arrest, two boats and the articles used and found therein — which are the cause of this controversy — were seized. A return was made and filed by L. H. Darwin, state fish commissioner, of the seizure, to and in the superior court of said county, demanding that all the property should be forfeited to the state.' The British Columbia Packers’ Association, of British…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boggs v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  2. United States v. Two Barrels WhiskyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1899
  3. United States v. One AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1916
  4. United States v. Two Gallons of WhiskyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1914
  5. The CalypsoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C. J. Hendry Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Moore v. Purse Seine NetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. C. J. Hendry Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API