Legal Opinion

United States v. One Automobile

District Court, D. Montana

Decided November 25, 1916No. 204PublishedCited by 11 opinions

At Law. Proceeding by the United States against Joseph Pablo for the forfeiture of one automobile, in which Floyd J. Logan intervened, claiming the motorcar.

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

The information alleges defendant Pablo in the defendant automobile introduced whisky into the Indian country, and prays forfeiture. Pablo denies the introduction, and pleads, as does intervener Logan, that his only right to said automobile is that of conditional'vendee, title to remain in the vendor, Logan, until payment, not yet made.

*892[ 1 ] It appears Pablo was and is an Indian ward of the United States, and, resident in the Indian country at all times material herein, in said automobile did introduce whisky into the Indian country, and at the time of introduction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. United States v. Two Gallons of WhiskyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1914
  3. The CalypsoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  4. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. One Saxon AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
  2. One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. United States v. One Buick Roadster AutomobileDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Whitney v. WelnitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API