Legal Opinion

Craig v. Butler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

The defense below to an action on promissory notes given by plaintiffs in error, arose out of the following state of facts, substantially. The firm of Frost & Bradley *23had, during the years 1855 and 1856, raised money by borrowing from Butler, upon their notes, endorsed by the Craigs for accomodation. The amount borrowed does not appear. In August, 1857, after deducting all payments upon the principal and making no allowance on account of illegal interest paid, there remained a balance of principal of $2,540, for which new notes were given by Frost & Bradley, endorsed by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thurston v. PrentissMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Chadbourn v. WattsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Cook v. DyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. KimmelMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Darling v. MarchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1842

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holland v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Sultan v. Central Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Collins Iron Co. v. BurkamMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Gerlaugh v. BassettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API