Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Kimmel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1848PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Usury, under R. S. 1S3S, is a personal defence, to be interposed by a party, to the contract, of which a subsequent purchaser cannot avail kimself._

Appeal from the Court of Chancery. In June, 1848, Kimmel filed a bill in the court of chancery to foreclose a mortgage executed to him by one Ward, on the 11th February, 1841. The bank held a subse*85quent mortgage given by Ward, and in its answer set up usury in the mortgage to Kimmel. The usury consisted in the conveyance by Ward to Kimmel, of a village lot, not covered by the mortgage, as a bonus or consideration for the loan, beyond the legal…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pritchett v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Central Holding Co. v. BushmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Lee v. FeamsterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Sellers v. BotsfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API