Legal Opinion

Linwood State Bank v. Lientz

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 13, 1967No. 52168PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELBORN, Commissioner.

The Linwood State Bank sued the appellant here, Laclede Lientz, and four co-guarantors to recover $44,237.89 upon their guaranty of obligations of The Lientz Company, Inc. Appellant Lientz denied liability on the guaranty agreement and cross claimed against his four coguarantors for any amount for which he might be found liable to the bank. Lientz also filed a similar claim against third party defendant Rodney Hill. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of Hill. A jury found in favor of the bank and against the five co-guarantors in the sum of $43,114.38 and in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilks v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Milligan v. G. D. Milligan Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank of St. Clair v. Burns & Hood Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Ladd & Bush v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Royal Banks of Missouri v. FridkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Hammons v. EhneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Preferred Physicians Mutual Management Group v. Preferred Physicians Mutual Risk RetentionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API