Legal Opinion
Ladd & Bush v. Hayes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1939No. 9069PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Suit on a contract of guaranty was brought by appellant, Ladd & Bush, an Oregon banking corporation, against appellee, Hayes, a citizen and resident of California. The cause was tried without a jury arid judgment given in appellee’s favor.
The contract, signed by appellee on April 14, 1930, is as follows:
“Guaranty of Indebtedness. In consideration of One Dollar and of present and future loans and extensions of credit to L. O. Herrold, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Debtor’, by Ladd & Bush, bankers of Salem, Ore., hereinafter referred to as the ‘Bank’, the undersigned…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Wilcox v. DraperNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Linwood State Bank v. LientzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Citibank, N.A. v. BenkoczyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1983
- Community National Bank v. LoumosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Kresge Department Stores, Inc. v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944