Legal Opinion

Ladd & Bush v. Hayes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1939No. 9069PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

Suit on a contract of guaranty was brought by appellant, Ladd & Bush, an Oregon banking corporation, against appellee, Hayes, a citizen and resident of California. The cause was tried without a jury arid judgment given in appellee’s favor.

The contract, signed by appellee on April 14, 1930, is as follows:

“Guaranty of Indebtedness. In consideration of One Dollar and of present and future loans and extensions of credit to L. O. Herrold, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Debtor’, by Ladd & Bush, bankers of Salem, Ore., hereinafter referred to as the ‘Bank’, the undersigned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Wilcox v. DraperNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linwood State Bank v. LientzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. BenkoczyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1983
  3. Community National Bank v. LoumosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  4. Kresge Department Stores, Inc. v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API