Farmers & Merchants Bank of St. Clair v. Burns & Hood Motor Co.

MATTHES, Judge.

In this jury-waived action upon a promissory note the court found for defendant. From the judgment so rendered plaintiff has appealed, contending that the testimony *200offered and evidence produced by the defendant constituted no. defense to the action, and that judgment should have been rendered for the balance due on the note. Defendant has not favored this court with a brief.

The facts and circumstances giving rise to the controversy grew out of the execution of a promissory note on October 30, 1951, in the principal sum of $400, payable to order of plaintiff in equal…