Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Hatch

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1955No. Civ. 8593PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tern. *

This is an appeal from a money judgment in favor of plaintiffs-respondents and against defendants-appellants in the sum of $3,000 plus interest for damages based upon a finding by the court that respondents were entitled to rescission of a contract for purchase from appellants of the right to manufacture and sell a “bust pad” with the trade name of “Hatch Contourette.”

The appeal also purports to be from the order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. Since there is no appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial in a civil action, this portion of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Gillespie v. GillespieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Pores v. Purity Milk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Galper v. GalperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Watson v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Bonaccorso v. KaplanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API