Hayden v. Hatch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, J. pro tern. *
This is an appeal from a money judgment in favor of plaintiffs-respondents and against defendants-appellants in the sum of $3,000 plus interest for damages based upon a finding by the court that respondents were entitled to rescission of a contract for purchase from appellants of the right to manufacture and sell a “bust pad” with the trade name of “Hatch Contourette.”
The appeal also purports to be from the order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. Since there is no appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial in a civil action, this portion of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gillespie v. GillespieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Estate of PhelpsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Pores v. Purity Milk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Galper v. GalperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Watson v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bonaccorso v. KaplanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.