Legal Opinion

Pores v. Purity Milk Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1955No. Civ. 8618PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem. *

This appeal is from the judgments in three separate cases which were consolidated for trial. The appeal is founded upon only one issue which is common to all three cases, that issue being whether appellants are entitled to redress from respondent Edward Alves personally by reason of circumstances which appellants claim justify disregarding the corporate shield of a California corporation set up by Alves and others and known as “Purity Milk Co.” Appellants maintain that the corporation was merely the alter ego of Edward Alves; that in all transactions involved prior to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Sonkin v. HershonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Hicks v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Patterson v. MisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API