Legal Opinion

James A. Pousson v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 26, 2009No. 07-3315PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

This matter comes before us because the Secretary failed to timely file the designation of record (DOR) by January 18, 2008, as required by Rule 10 of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (“Court’s Rules”) (Secretary must file DOR no later than 60 days after Notice of Appeal is filed, which in this case was filed on October 23, 2007). Over the ensuing months, and in lieu of filing the DOR, the Secretary filed two motions seeking an extension of time because the Office of General Counsel (OGC) had not yet received the DOR. These motions did not explain why the OGC had not yet…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. CBOCS West, Inc. v. HumphriesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  5. Mokal v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland D. Harvey v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
  2. Gene S. Groves v. Denis McDonoughUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2021
  3. Gene S. Groves v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
  4. Gene S. Groves v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API