Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Muzio
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 26, 2008No. 3:07cv59 (SRU)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Steven K. Stanley commenced this civil rights action pro se and in forma pauperis. He named as defendants two State Judicial Marshals, the Connecticut State Police and individual troopers and officers of the Connecticut State Police. On March 13, 2007, the court filed its Initial Review Order dismissing all claims except the claims for false imprisonment and use of excessive force against State Judicial Marshals Muzio and Hardy (“the defendants”). The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Kleinberg v. Jason J. Guerrera and Garrett OsterfinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Febres v. Yale New Haven HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Lisa Y.S. West v. Deputy Terry DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Lisa Y.S. West v. Deputy Terry DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014