Legal Opinion

Hampleton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 2010No. 07-CF-343PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Associate Judge:

After the trial court denied his motions to suppress, a jury convicted appellant Casey Hampleton of three counts of armed robbery, three counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and one count of unauthorized use of a motor vehi cle. 1 On appeal, he argues that show-up identifications and certain physical evidence should have been suppressed as the fruit of an illegal seizure. He further argues that his convictions for possession of a firearm during a crime of violence should merge. We agree with appellant’s merger argument, but otherwise affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Henson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Anthony Hooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Hargraves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API