Legal Opinion
Castillo-Antonio v. Bueno
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 13, 2019No. 3:18-cv-04589Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JOSE DANIEL CASTILLO-ANTONIO, Case No.18-cv-04589-JSC 6 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 7 v. FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES 8 GUADALUPE ANTONIO BUENO, Re: Dkt. No. 46 Defendant. 9 10 11 Plaintiff Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio (“Plaintiff”), a physically disabled person, and 12 Defendant Guadalupe Antonio Bueno (“Defendant Bueno”), the owner and operator of Tacos 13 Sinaloa, reached a settlement agreement after Plaintiff sued Defendant for multiple Americans 14 with Disabilities Act violations, claiming that Bueno’s business…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.