Serritella v. Engelman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs in these cases are challenging New Jersey Welfare regulations,1 which provide that pre-termination fair hearings be held at the county level, as being inconsistent with HEW regulations 2 requiring such hearings at the state level.3
Under the New Jersey system, a welfare recipient’s benefits may be terminated following an adverse adjudication at the county level and before an appeal to the state agency. To justify its scheme, the state contends that the federal regulation is invalid because it is inconsistent with 42 U.S.C. § 602, allowing a “two-tiered” state…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Almenares v. WymanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
4Cited by8 opinions
- Zeffiro v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Ferguson v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Green v. PhilbrookDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1977
- Rochester v. BaganzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.