State Ex Rel. Booth v. Beck Jewelry Enterprises, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRlCHMAN, J.
Appellant in its complaint for a permanent injunction charged that certain conduct of appellees constituted the practice of optometry within the meaning of chapter 38 of the Acts of 1935 requiring licenses which appellees did not possess. The judgment followed the prayer of the complaint that appellees “be and they hereby are permanently enjoined from practicing or engaging in the practice of optometry in thé State of Indiana without the license required by law.” Without filing motion to modify the judgment appellant appealed. After the case had been fully briefed on the merits at the time of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fleenor v. DriskillIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Alyea v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Kindy Opticians, Inc. v. State Board of Examiners in OptometryMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Hanley v. MasonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Farley v. FarleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Public Service Commission v. Fort Wayne Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Gavin v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.