Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul F. Soares

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1993No. 92-10574PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

On June 13, 1990, a federal grand jury returned a seven count indictment against defendant Paul Fairfax Soares. The indictment charged Soares with four counts of having received kickbacks “because of’ his fiduciary position as the investment advisor for an employee pension plan, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1954 (counts one through four), and with three counts of embezzling money from the same employee pension plan, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664 (counts five through seven). After waiving his right to a jury trial, Soares was convicted on counts one through four and on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. United States v. McCordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. CrossDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  4. United States v. ScarmazzoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API