Legal Opinion
United States v. Cross
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 1, 2000No. 3:15-cr-00003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Entry On Government’s Motion in Limine
TINDER, District Judge.
The government moves for an order in limine prohibiting the defendants from offering the following: (1) evidence of the defendants’ knowledge or intent regarding whether the business involved illegal gambling, (2) evidence of other jurisdictions’ actions regarding gambling, and (3) opinion testimony of how the gambling devices owned and run by the defendants operate when that testimony is not supported by a foundation. Before addressing the motion in limine, however, the court addresses a few issues relating to the allegations of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hawthorne Partners v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- United States v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Weststar Mortgage Corp. v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- United States v. YeleyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.