Beveridge v. Bailey

On the 30th of June opinion was filed in this case, and is reported in 220 N. W. 462. An application for a re*383hearing is now before us,, and because of its apparent sincerity and the earnest manner in which it is argued we explain the position of the court in denying the application.

It is claimed that we must have overlooked the fact that a large part of the property willed to respondent was jointly owned by the MtKinneys at the time the will was made. It is then vigorously argued that that fact is sufficient to show a joint will, and to establish a contract in favor of respondent. We did not…