Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Polansky

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1944No. 4823PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

We have here two suits seeking enforcement of an alleged oral contract or agreement to make a joint, or mutual will, the cases being consolidated for trial and appeal. Defendants contend that while the wills are written as one document and may be referred to in the discussion as “joint,” or “mutual,” or “joint and mutual,” that each will is, in fact, complete in itself and that no attempt is made by either to make joint disposition of their after the death of the survivor, and that the language of the will, or wills, moreover, bears no such interpretation; that there is neither…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Frazier v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Baker v. SyfrittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Campbell v. DunkelbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HeeterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Brown v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State ex rel. Magee v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Davis v. CampbellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Mills v. KellyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API