Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Alabama & C. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[This was a bill in equity by JohD C; Stanton and others, trustees, against the Alabama & Chattanooga Railroad Company and others.J Heard upon petition of certain bondholders. The case was this: The defendant company was a corporation of the state of Alabama, whose existence and franchises had been recognized by legislation in the states of Tennessee, Georgia and Mississippi.

Read the full summary

[This was a bill in equity by JohD C; Stanton and others, trustees, against the Alabama & Chattanooga Railroad Company and others.J Heard upon petition of certain bondholders. The case was this: The defendant company was a corporation of the state of Alabama, whose existence and franchises had been recognized by legislation in the states of Tennessee, Georgia and Mississippi. The company was authorized to construct and use a railroad running from Chattanooga in the state of Tennessee, across the states of Georgia and Alabama to Meridian in the state of Mississippi. An act of the legislature…

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

It is conceded that the petitioners are holders of the high numbered bonds for value and without actual notice of any infirmity attaching to them. These bonds are commercial paper, and as such are binding upon the railroad company when in the hands of a bona fide holder for value. Commissioners of Knox County v. Aspinwall, 21 How. [62 U. S.] 539; Woods v. Lawrence Co., 1 Black [66 U. S.] 386; Mercer Co. v. Hackett, 1 Wall. [68 U. S.] 95; Gelpcke v. Dubuque, Id. 175; Van Hostrop v. Madison City, Id. 291; Meyer v. Muscatine, Id. 384; Murray v. Lardner, 2 Wall. [69 U. S.]…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stanton v. Alabama & C. R. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Trust Co. v. Woodbridge Canal & Irrigation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
  2. Low v. BlackfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
  3. Lyman v. Kansas City & A. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API