Legal Opinion
Donna Crossman v. Michael MacCoccio
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 21, 1986No. 86-1058PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Because of a potential timeliness jurisdictional problem, plaintiffs-appellants were directed to show cause why their appeal should not be dismissed in part. The parties have now responded, and we conclude the appeal must be dismissed to the extent plaintiffs-appellants purport to appeal from the October 9, 1985 judgments and the November 8 or 14, 1985 denial of their motion for a new trial.
We recount the background. Plaintiffs brought a § 1983 action complaining of police officers’ entry into plaintiffs’ home and subsequent conduct towards plaintiffs. Prior to trial, defendants made an offer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Harold Daniels and Irene DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Harry J. Holmes v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Thomas J. Morgan v. Union Metal ManufacturingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Harold Daniels and Irene DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Nineteen Appeals Arising Out of the San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Michael Grosvenor v. Stephen Brienen, Individually and as Sheriff of the County of McLean John Foster, and Gordon SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Witty v. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Beckwith MacHinery Company v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Lentomyynti Oy v. Medivac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.