Legal Opinion
Lentomyynti Oy v. Medivac, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 1, 1993No. Nos. 92-2150 & 93-1371PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
This consolidated appeal challenges both the judgment on the merits and the post-judgment award of costs. Having concluded that we have jurisdiction over the appeal on the merits, we affirm the judgment of the district court entered in favor of the defendants. However, we remand the ease for a new costs award.
I. Jurisdiction
The defendants contend that because the plaintiffs’ appeal of the merits is untimely, we lack jurisdiction to hear it.1 We do not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal unless an appellant files a timely notice of appeal. Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Daigle v. Maine Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Paganis v. BlonsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- S.A. Healy Company v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lawshe v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Michael Kunik and Lisa Kretschmer v. Racine County, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.