Eaddy v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUFF, J.:
In this workers’ compensation action, Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (Smurfit-Stone) appeals the trial court’s order affirming the order of the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) awarding medical expenses and workers’ compensation benefits to Marshall Eaddy. We affirm.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Eaddy began working at. Smurfit-Stone in the mid-1960s. He primarily worked as a general mechanic, which involved strenuous physical labor at times. Prior to joining SmurfitStone, Eaddy spent one year as a student at Clemson University followed by one year of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- R & G Construction Inc. v. Lowcountry Regional Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence HospitalsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Bone v. U.S. Food ServiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.