Legal Opinion

Eaddy v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 27, 2003No. 3643PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFF, J.:

In this workers’ compensation action, Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (Smurfit-Stone) appeals the trial court’s order affirming the order of the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) awarding medical expenses and workers’ compensation benefits to Marshall Eaddy. We affirm.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Eaddy began working at. Smurfit-Stone in the mid-1960s. He primarily worked as a general mechanic, which involved strenuous physical labor at times. Prior to joining SmurfitStone, Eaddy spent one year as a student at Clemson University followed by one year of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. R & G Construction Inc. v. Lowcountry Regional Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence HospitalsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Bone v. U.S. Food ServiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API