Legal Opinion
Patents Process, Inc. v. Durst
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1934No. 7053PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Patents Process, Inc., a corporation, is the alter ego of Frank D. Williams. Bankruptcy proceedings were filed against both and the proceedings were consolidated. The adjudication of bankruptcy was made on November 14,1929. Prior thereto an action had been brought by Mildred E. Williams against Frank D. Williams and Patents Process, Inc. Harry Schenck was appointed receiver for the Patents Process, Inc. After the election and qualification of appellee Walter C. Durst as trustee in bankruptcy for the appellants, a turnover order was procured by the said trustee, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Home Discount Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1906
- Moore v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- In re Greek Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
- Lamson Co. v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Knapp & Spencer Co. v. DrewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fazakerly v. E. Kahn's Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- In Re New York InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- In Re San Francisco Bay ExpositionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1943
- In Re Great Western Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- California State Board of Equalization v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.