Legal Opinion
Moore v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1932No. 6505PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
Sitting in equity the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, on April 6, 1931, made an order allowing the final account of David B. Scott as receiver in equity of the assets of the Tungsten Products Company, and awarding compensation to the receiver and his eounsel, W. I. Titus. This appeal is brought by the trustee in bankruptcy, the bankruptcy having superseded the receivership by virtue of an adjudication dated November 21, 1930'.
By the terms of the order of adjudication, the District Court reserved the hearing and determination of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Emil v. HanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Western Pac. R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- In Re Merced Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Patents Process, Inc. v. DurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.