Legal Opinion

Tashenberg v. Breslin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly denied respondent’s motion for a change of venue. If this were simply a special proceeding for a judicial dissolution, venue would lie in the judicial district in which the office of the corporation is located, that location being the one designated in the certificate of incorporation (Business Corporation Law, § 102, subd [a], par [10]; § 1112; Hoffman v Oxford Devs., 9 AD2d 937). Here, however, inasmuch as the petitioner essentially seeks various other types of relief on his own behalf as a stockholder, director and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Feldmeier v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Blum v. GleitsmanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hoffman v. Oxford Developments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Feldmeier v. WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of Supplier Distribution Concepts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Shami v. F.O.A.N., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API