Legal Opinion
Feldmeier v. Webster
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
This is a motion by the defendants for an order to change the venue of this action from Onondaga County to Queens County. The suit is a stockholder’s derivative action and it is brought pursuant to section 60 of the General Corporation' Law. It is the contention of the defendants that the real plaintiff is Sanitary Processing Equipment Corporation and not Robert Feldmeier, a stockholder, and therefore, the action belongs to the corporation and not to the stockholders individually or collectively. (Carruthers v. Waite Min. Co., 306 N. Y. 136, 140.) Hence, it is argued that the residence of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carruthers v. Jack Waite Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Eston v. Argus, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Levey v. United States Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Tarrytown, White Plains & Mamaroneck Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blum v. GleitsmanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Tashenberg v. BreslinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Feldmeier v. WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Shami v. F.O.A.N., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010