Legal Opinion

Blum v. Gleitsman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

The defendants move for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for legal insufficiency and pursuant to section 241 of the Civil Practice Act, or for dismissal of specifications of alleged wrongdoing contained in paragraphs 9 through 12, and 14 through 21 for insufficiency, and for further relief pursuant to rule 103 and section 182 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 146 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

It is alleged in the first cause of action that the defendant Harold Gleitsman has held, since July 25, 1955, and now holds, 60.49% of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nauss v. Nauss Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Feldmeier v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tashenberg v. BreslinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Shami v. F.O.A.N., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API