Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Property Situated at Larchmont Manor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This proceeding was instituted by the owner, the respondent here, to procure an order vacating and canceling a notice of mechanic’s lien filed against real property by the appellant for services rendered as an architect. The grounds of the motion were that the notice did not comply with subdivisions 1 and 4 of section 9 of the Lien Law. The motion was granted.

The stating of the claimant’s business address instead of his residence in the notice did not violate the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 9 of the Lien Law. Furthermore, it is not shown that any substantial right of the owner was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fyfe v. . Sound Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Core Joint Concrete Pipe Corp. v. Paino Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Matter of Malbro Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Straightedge Bldrs., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Fibernet Telecom Group, Inc. v. East Coast Optical ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API