Southern Surety Co. v. Hotchkiss
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 13, 1925:
Esci-iweiler, J.
This appeal involves the same questions as to the construction to be given to secs. 3327a and 3347dd, Stats., that were presented and determined in the case decided herewith of the, same plaintiff against the Metropolitan Sewerage Commission {ante, p. 206, 201 N. W. 890, 204 N. W. 476), and what was there said must suffice for this case without repetition.
*229With the holding so now made, viz. that the right, so far as the lienability of claims is concerned, is to be tested and determined upon the same standard as similar claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- National Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. Pittsburgh & Buffalo Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Webb v. FrengWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Hansen v. RemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Moritz v. Sands Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Eagle River Union Free High School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Muller v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Standard Oil Co. v. MarvillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- National Grocery Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.