Legal Opinion
Customers Bank v. Boxer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 4, 2014No. AC35465PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The defendant Carlton Tucker appeals from the trial court’s judgment of immediate possession in favor of the plaintiff, Customers Bank. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in finding that he was not a bona fide tenant as defined by Title VII of the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009, known as the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-22, §§ 701-704, 123 Stat. 1660 (PTFA). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural history. The plaintiff acquired title to 426 Westover…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taft Realty Corp. v. Yorkhaven Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. ForvilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Baier v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Rutka v. City of MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaplan v. ScheerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- New Haven v. G. L. Capasso, IncConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014