Terris v. Kimmel
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] Scott and Rhonda Terris (the Ter-rises) appeal the district court’s Judgment, arising from a dispute relating to a lease agreement with Edwal Enterprises, Inc. and Edward Kimmel as principal of Edwal Enterprises, Inc. (Kimmel). Finding no error on the part of the district court, we will affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] 1. Did the district court err as a matter of law when it found that the Terrises breached the lease agreement and that Kim-mel did not breach the lease agreement?
2. Did the district court err by finding that Kimmel did not commit a conversion, that Kimmel did not act with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lieberman v. MossbrookWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Double Eagle Petroleum & Mining Corporation v. Questar Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Horse Creek Conservation District v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Attorney GeneralWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Meyer v. HattoWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jerry Herling v. Wyoming Machinery Co., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Janet G. Peterson v. Meritain Health, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Knight v. TCB CONST. AND DESIGN, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Orthopaedics of Jackson Hole, PC v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- American Nat. Bank v. SARAWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.