Legal Opinion

Terris v. Kimmel

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2010No. S-10-0028PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] Scott and Rhonda Terris (the Ter-rises) appeal the district court’s Judgment, arising from a dispute relating to a lease agreement with Edwal Enterprises, Inc. and Edward Kimmel as principal of Edwal Enterprises, Inc. (Kimmel). Finding no error on the part of the district court, we will affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] 1. Did the district court err as a matter of law when it found that the Terrises breached the lease agreement and that Kim-mel did not breach the lease agreement?

2. Did the district court err by finding that Kimmel did not commit a conversion, that Kimmel did not act with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. MossbrookWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Double Eagle Petroleum & Mining Corporation v. Questar Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Horse Creek Conservation District v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Attorney GeneralWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Meyer v. HattoWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jerry Herling v. Wyoming Machinery Co., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Janet G. Peterson v. Meritain Health, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Knight v. TCB CONST. AND DESIGN, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Orthopaedics of Jackson Hole, PC v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. American Nat. Bank v. SARAWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API