Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Hatto
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 2008No. S-07-0223, S-07-0224PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[¶1] These two consolidated appeals arise from the dismissal of a complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Richard and Miracles Meyer reside in Teton County, Wyoming. They own real property in the State of Hawaii. Tony Hatto and Ben Sullivan reside in Hawaii, They are partners in a business known as Design Workshop, also based in Hawaii. The Meyers entered into a contract with Design Workshop for the design of a residence the Meyers intended to build on their Hawaiian property.
[T2] The contractual relationship soured and ultimately the Meyers sued Design Workshop, as well…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Grange Insurance Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Derek Earl Hill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- OPERATION SAVE AMERICA v. City of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Sweet v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Weldon v. Ramstad-HvassCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Harold H. Dishman v. First Interstate BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.