Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Globe Solvent Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 17, 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TEASE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Wilhelm, an employee of a dry cleaning plant, seeks to hold the manufacturers and distributors of a cleaning solvent liable for injuries he received while working with the solvent at the place of his employment.

While the facts as to how the accident happened are in dispute, the facts as they appear most favorable to the plaintiff are as follows: On March 1, 1973, Wilhelm was working in the dry cleaning area of the plant loading and unloading clothes from the dry cleaning machines. .While so engaged he wore a terry cloth towel about his waist to protect his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Markle v. Mulholland's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Shelby J. Burton, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Lee Burton, Deceased v. L. O. Smith Foundry Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Martin v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  4. Martz v. Miller Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
  5. Munetz v. Eaton Yale & Towne, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development CtrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  2. Nutt v. AC & S. CO., INC.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Cropper v. Rego Distribution Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  4. Hargis v. DoeOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. In Re Asbestos Litigation (Mergenthaler)Superior Court of Delaware · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API