Legal Opinion

In Re Asbestos Litigation (Mergenthaler)

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 21, 1986PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPPITI, Judge.

This is a decision on Herty Foundation’s Motion for Summary Judgment against all plaintiffs in the above actions. The motion in substantial part presents the question of whether the so-called “sophisticated purchaser” defense is available in Delaware. Some background facts are necessary to place the issue in perspective. Except where otherwise noted, these facts are undisputed in the record before the Court.

The Herty Foundation (hereinafter “Herty”) is a non-profit, federally tax-exempt trusteeship of the State of Georgia. It was formed to promote Georgia in the pulp and paper…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development CtrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  2. Webb v. Special Electric Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kennedy v. Mobay Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Mack v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Kelvin Manbodh Asbestos Litigation Series v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API