Legal Opinion

Munetz v. Eaton Yale & Towne, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 69-950PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BRODERICK, District Judge.

Presently before this Court is the motion of the plaintiff to amend the caption and to correct the party named in the complaint. The question before this Court is whether the requested amendment would merely correct a misnomer and thus properly name an entity which was already served prior to the running of the applicable statute of limitations, or whether the requested amendment substitutes a new party for the named defendant and is thus barred by the statute of limitations.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. A. H. Fischer Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. Glen Graves v. General Insurance Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Kerner v. RackmillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Sanders v. MetzgerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Sechrist v. PalshookDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Malcolm Simmons and Doris Simmons v. Teresa D. Fenton and James L. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. Larry v. Penn Truck Aids, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Slack v. Treadway Inn of Lake Harmony, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Winterberg v. CNA InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. LaForest v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API