Legal Opinion

State v. Bobo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1989No. 56335PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ann McManamon, Chief Justice.

Defendant Karlos Bobo timely appeals his conviction for aggravated murder (R.C. 2903.01) with a firearm specification (R.C. 2929.71), raising seven assignments of error. 1 Bobo claims: (1) his confession was coerced and that the trial court erred by twice denying his motion to suppress his statements to police; (2) his waiver of rights was ineffective in the absence of parental guidance; (3) other acts testimony admitted was more prejudicial than probative; and (4) the court abused its discretion by admitting rebuttal testimony regarding other alleged criminal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SokeOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. SemenchukOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. KimmieOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. AbdiOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API