Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Millard County Drainage Dist. No. 3

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1928No. 4743PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

The plaintiff, the owner of an unpaid bond of $500 maturing August 1, 1928, issued by the Millard County drainage district No. 3, in this proceeding applies for a writ of mandate requiring the board of supervisors of the district to prepare a statement and estimate, etc., and certify a tax of $75 per acre on all of the lands in the district, for the purpose of raising money to pay the plaintiff’s claim and other indebtedness, together aggregating $600,000', maturing at the same time. Pursuant to the application, an alternative writ was issued, and in response thereto due return has been made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. McCormack v. PatchinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Hanscom v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Nelson v. Board of Com'rsUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Coleman v. Eight Mile Drainage District No. TwoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanson v. BurrisUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Elkins v. Millard County Drainage Dist. No. 3Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bothwell v. Salt Lake County Drainage Dist. No. 2.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hanson v. BurrisUtah Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API