Legal Opinion

Bruster v. Etheridge

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 2, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

SHRIVER, J.

This is a will contest involving two wills of Lipe Henslee, deceased. The first is a typewritten will prepared by a lawyer and signed by the testa*269tor in tlie presence of witnesses, who attested same as subscribing’ witnesses. This will is dated February 10, 1957. The other is a holographic will dated August 4, 1957. Both are exhibited in the record.

The holographic will of August 4,1957, was offered for probate in the County Court of Dickson County, Tennessee, and duly probated in common form. Mrs. Helen T. Bruster, the proponent of said will, and plaintiff in error here, was named…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peck v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Poole v. First Nat. Bank of SmyrnaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  3. Hickey v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Jones v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  5. Railroad Co. v. BrundigeTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Green v. HigdonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. Owen v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Charles Moore v. Clyde GreenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Dorothy Owen v. George SummersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. Estate of W.O. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API